Month: August 2017

Boris Akunin “The Week of the Three-Eyed”

The novel The Week of the Three-Eyed is quite interesting and in some chapters reminds me of the works about Erast Fandorin, though only slightly. It’s an easy read but doesn’t evoke much excitement, especially considering that the fourth “historical” volume about the same period is far more gripping. It feels more like an addition to the historical narrative, and as a standalone book, it falls short even compared to the previous fictional parts of the series, not to mention the famous Fandorin cycle.

The play Kill the Viperling felt even more lackluster, more like a reflection on what Russia could have been without Peter the Great. Although, there’s still a big question of whether that was ever really possible.

Boris Akunin “Between Europe and Asia. The History of the Russian State. The Seventeenth Century”

The entire series by Boris Akunin on the history of the Russian state is very easy and interesting to read. Perhaps, at times, he adds personal emotions, but I didn’t notice any major discrepancies. Especially when you consider that history is often shaped by the victors , and the emotional component actually benefits the text, making it more engaging to read.

The fourth volume covers the Time of Troubles (after Boris Godunov), the rise of the Romanov dynasty, the annexation of Ukraine, and ends right before the final ascension of Peter the Great (which will be the focus of the next volume).

Read more

Keith R. A. DeCandido “Serenity”

I am a big fan of ‘Firefly’ series and ‘Serenity’ movie as well. But this particular novel is mostly just a novelization of the ‘Serenity’ movie. Yes, it definitely gives you more inner emotions and thoughts of characters than a movie can do. But still it is just a text version of the story you know (if you watched the movie), slightly adopted screenplay, I guess.

The novel is good for fans, and I even want to re-watch the original series after that, but really don’t expect a lot here.